Ecuador vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square

Ecuador
111,167 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
104,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
103rd
Iceland rank
105th

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Iceland
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 111,167 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 104,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 7,097 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Ecuador ranks 103rd and Iceland ranks 105th of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 23,067 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,181 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 885.57 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 31,112 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 926.55 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 38,810 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,725 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 84.25 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 60,818 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 65,080 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,262 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 95,273 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 76,062 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,211 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 101,794 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92,178 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square, Ecuador or Iceland?
Ecuador, at 111,167 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 104,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square between Ecuador and Iceland?
7,097 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Iceland rank globally for imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 103rd and Iceland ranks 105th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/iceland/">Ecuador vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.