Cuba vs Nicaragua: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square

Cuba
79,578 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
75,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
111th
Nicaragua rank
112th

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Nicaragua
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 79,578 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 75,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 3,926 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 111th and Nicaragua ranks 112th of 169 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 52,892 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,786 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 43,106 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 86,320 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,180 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,139 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 47,374 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,232 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,142 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 65,283 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,252 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 107,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 52,013 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 86,062 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 66,423 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,639 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square, Cuba or Nicaragua?
Cuba, at 79,578 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 75,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square between Cuba and Nicaragua?
3,926 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Nicaragua?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Nicaragua rank globally for imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 111th and Nicaragua ranks 112th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Nicaragua: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/nicaragua/">Cuba vs Nicaragua: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.