Bolivia vs Zimbabwe: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square

Bolivia
11,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
11,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
156th
Zimbabwe rank
157th

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Bolivia
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 11,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 11,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 37 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 2,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,431 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 221.7 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1980s 2,198 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,389 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,191 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 4,007 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,165 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,158 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 6,187 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,984 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 10,623 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,528 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,905 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 10,323 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,103 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square, Bolivia or Zimbabwe?
Bolivia, at 11,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 11,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square between Bolivia and Zimbabwe?
37 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Zimbabwe?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Zimbabwe rank globally for imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Bolivia ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Zimbabwe: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zimbabwe/">Bolivia vs Zimbabwe: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.