Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Hong Kong, China
86,622 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
OECD members
12,136 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
4th
OECD members rank
5th

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • OECD members
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119932025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 86,622 constant 2015 US$ per person against 12,136 constant 2015 US$ per person in OECD members, a difference of 74,486 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 7.1 times OECD members's.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and OECD members ranks 5th of 172 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 4,118 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,894 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,224 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1980s 10,357 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,589 constant 2015 US$ per person 7,768 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 29,557 constant 2015 US$ per person 4,311 constant 2015 US$ per person 25,246 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 52,011 constant 2015 US$ per person 7,308 constant 2015 US$ per person 44,703 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 81,875 constant 2015 US$ per person 9,508 constant 2015 US$ per person 72,366 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 81,204 constant 2015 US$ per person 11,324 constant 2015 US$ per person 69,880 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Hong Kong, China or OECD members?
Hong Kong, China, at 86,622 constant 2015 US$ per person against 12,136 constant 2015 US$ per person in OECD members as of 2025.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
74,486 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and OECD members rank globally for imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and OECD members ranks 5th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/">Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 9,095 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.