Libya vs Tanzania: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Libya
18,916 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
18,204 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
174th
Tanzania rank
176th

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Tanzania
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k197619992023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 18,916 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 18,204 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 712 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 174th and Tanzania ranks 176th of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 4,555 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,222 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,333 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
1980s 5,703 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,323 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,380 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
1990s 4,293 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,184 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,109 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2000s 8,071 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,006 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,065 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2010s 14,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,476 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,801 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 14,336 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,116 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 780.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Libya or Tanzania?
Libya, at 18,916 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 18,204 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Libya and Tanzania?
712 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tanzania?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Libya and Tanzania rank globally for imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 174th and Tanzania ranks 176th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Tanzania: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/tanzania/">Libya vs Tanzania: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.