Eswatini vs Tunisia: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
141,302 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
120th
Tunisia rank
118th

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Tunisia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197419982023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 141,302 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 4,137 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 120th and Tunisia ranks 118th of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 17,051 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14,071 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,980 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 29,757 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24,371 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,386 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 64,311 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 50,235 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14,076 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 111,052 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 100,038 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,014 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 115,422 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 149,545 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 34,123 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 123,640 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 124,209 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 568.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 141,302 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Tunisia?
4,137 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tunisia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Tunisia rank globally for imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 120th and Tunisia ranks 118th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tunisia: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tunisia/">Eswatini vs Tunisia: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.