Eswatini vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
136,183 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
120th
Iceland rank
121st

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k197419982023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 136,183 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 982 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 120th and Iceland ranks 121st of 198 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 17,051 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,376 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 29,757 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,778 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,979 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 64,311 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24,084 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 40,227 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 111,052 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 56,824 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 54,229 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 115,422 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 82,617 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 32,805 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 123,640 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 111,616 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,024 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Iceland?
Eswatini, at 137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 136,183 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Iceland?
982 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Iceland?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Iceland rank globally for imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 120th and Iceland ranks 121st of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/iceland/">Eswatini vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.