Eswatini vs Gambia: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
133,742 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
120th
Gambia rank
123rd

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Gambia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197419982023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 133,742 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 3,423 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 41 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 120th and Gambia ranks 123rd of 198 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Gambia Difference Ahead
1970s 22,030 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,466 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,564 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 29,757 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,984 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16,773 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 61,742 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24,772 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 36,969 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 125,596 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 96,318 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 115,422 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 45,132 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 70,290 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 123,640 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 88,938 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 34,703 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Gambia?
Eswatini, at 137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 133,742 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Gambia?
3,423 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
41 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 120th and Gambia ranks 123rd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Gambia: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/gambia-the/">Eswatini vs Gambia: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.