Chile vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
134,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
136,183 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
122nd
Iceland rank
121st

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k197519992023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 136,183 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 134,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 1,484 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Iceland ahead.

Chile ranks 122nd and Iceland ranks 121st of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 4,623 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,053 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 7,839 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,778 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,938 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 21,835 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24,084 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,249 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 50,541 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 56,824 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,282 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 108,844 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 82,617 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26,226 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 131,173 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 111,616 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 19,557 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Iceland?
Iceland, at 136,183 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 134,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Iceland?
1,484 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 122nd and Iceland ranks 121st of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/iceland/">Chile vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.