Chile vs Eswatini: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
134,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
122nd
Eswatini rank
120th

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Eswatini
050.0k100.0k150.0k197419982023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 134,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 2,466 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Eswatini ahead.

Chile ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 120th of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 4,251 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,724 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,473 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 7,839 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29,757 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21,918 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 21,835 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 64,311 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 42,476 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 50,541 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 111,052 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 60,511 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 108,844 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 115,422 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,578 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 131,173 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 123,640 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,533 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 137,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 134,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Eswatini?
2,466 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 120th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Eswatini: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/eswatini/">Chile vs Eswatini: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.