Brazil vs Malawi: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
40,767 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
42,439 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
155th
Malawi rank
154th

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Malawi
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197519992023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 42,439 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 40,767 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 1,672 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Malawi ahead.

Brazil ranks 155th and Malawi ranks 154th of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 2,125 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,011 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,886 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 2,583 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,898 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,315 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 6,123 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,509 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,386 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 13,642 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,203 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 438.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 33,083 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29,779 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,304 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 37,056 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 39,703 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,647 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Malawi?
Malawi, at 42,439 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 40,767 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Malawi?
1,672 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malawi?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Malawi rank globally for imports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 155th and Malawi ranks 154th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Malawi: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/malawi/">Brazil vs Malawi: Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.