New Caledonia vs Pakistan: Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre

New Caledonia
3,387 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
2,834 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
139th
Pakistan rank
140th

Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Pakistan
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 3,387 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,834 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 553 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Pakistan ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 139th and Pakistan ranks 140th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 287.11 current US$ per square kilometre 465.46 current US$ per square kilometre 178.35 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 746.08 current US$ per square kilometre 495.64 current US$ per square kilometre 250.44 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 2,027 current US$ per square kilometre 1,001 current US$ per square kilometre 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 2,777 current US$ per square kilometre 1,416 current US$ per square kilometre 1,361 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 2,822 current US$ per square kilometre 2,248 current US$ per square kilometre 573.11 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 4,098 current US$ per square kilometre 3,428 current US$ per square kilometre 670.26 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 3,059 current US$ per square kilometre 4,393 current US$ per square kilometre 1,335 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports by region of origin, per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Pakistan?
New Caledonia, at 3,387 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,834 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports by region of origin, per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Pakistan?
553 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Pakistan?
61 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Pakistan rank globally for imports by region of origin, per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 139th and Pakistan ranks 140th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Pakistan: Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-by-region-of-origin-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-by-region-of-origin-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/pakistan/">New Caledonia vs Pakistan: Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 10,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports by region of origin divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.