Barbados vs Bermuda: Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre

Barbados
3.47 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda
15.10 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
8th
Bermuda rank
6th

Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Bermuda
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Bermuda currently reports 15.10 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.47 million current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 11.63 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bermuda's figure about 4.4 times Barbados's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Bermuda has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 8th and Bermuda ranks 6th of 204 countries.

Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Bermuda Difference Ahead
1960s 52,186 current US$ per square kilometre 686,111 current US$ per square kilometre 633,925 current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda
1970s 269,482 current US$ per square kilometre 2.13 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.86 million current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda
1980s 852,764 current US$ per square kilometre 6.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.17 million current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda
1990s 1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 8.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.36 million current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda
2000s 2.08 million current US$ per square kilometre 14.92 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.84 million current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda
2010s 2.43 million current US$ per square kilometre 16.53 million current US$ per square kilometre 14.09 million current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda
2020s 3.05 million current US$ per square kilometre 15.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.30 million current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports by region of origin, per square kilometre, Barbados or Bermuda?
Bermuda, at 15.10 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.47 million current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports by region of origin, per square kilometre between Barbados and Bermuda?
11.63 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Bermuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Bermuda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Bermuda rank globally for imports by region of origin, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 8th and Bermuda ranks 6th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Bermuda: Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-by-region-of-origin-per-square-kilometre/barbados/bermuda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-by-region-of-origin-per-square-kilometre/barbados/bermuda/">Barbados vs Bermuda: Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 10,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports by region of origin divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.