Argentina vs Cote d'Ivoire: Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre

Argentina
3,916 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire
4,193 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
136th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
133rd

Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Cote d'Ivoire
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 4,193 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,916 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 277 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 136th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Cote d'Ivoire in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1960s 128.88 current US$ per square kilometre 49.49 current US$ per square kilometre 79.39 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 288.7 current US$ per square kilometre 289.5 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8033 current US$ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 504.72 current US$ per square kilometre 367.3 current US$ per square kilometre 137.42 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 1,705 current US$ per square kilometre 517.01 current US$ per square kilometre 1,188 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 1,962 current US$ per square kilometre 606.61 current US$ per square kilometre 1,355 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 4,012 current US$ per square kilometre 1,848 current US$ per square kilometre 2,164 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 3,369 current US$ per square kilometre 3,441 current US$ per square kilometre 71.76 current US$ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports by region of origin, per square kilometre, Argentina or Cote d'Ivoire?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 4,193 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,916 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports by region of origin, per square kilometre between Argentina and Cote d'Ivoire?
277 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cote d'Ivoire?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for imports by region of origin, per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 136th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Cote d'Ivoire: Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-by-region-of-origin-per-square-kilometre/argentina/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-by-region-of-origin-per-square-kilometre/argentina/cote-d-ivoire/">Argentina vs Cote d'Ivoire: Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports by region of origin, per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 10,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports by region of origin divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.