Afghanistan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: IMF Quota, US dollar, per square kilometre

Afghanistan
666.07 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo
630.87 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
166th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
168th

IMF Quota, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 666.07 units per square kilometre against 630.87 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 35.2 units per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 166th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 168th of 189 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 38.93 units per square kilometre 18.94 units per square kilometre 19.99 units per square kilometre Afghanistan
1970s 69.98 units per square kilometre 63.17 units per square kilometre 6.81 units per square kilometre Afghanistan
1980s 148.68 units per square kilometre 143.8 units per square kilometre 4.88 units per square kilometre Afghanistan
1990s 238.73 units per square kilometre 181.19 units per square kilometre 57.54 units per square kilometre Afghanistan
2000s 336.98 units per square kilometre 315.46 units per square kilometre 21.51 units per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 498.21 units per square kilometre 471.88 units per square kilometre 26.33 units per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 684.16 units per square kilometre 648 units per square kilometre 36.15 units per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf quota, us dollar, per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Afghanistan, at 666.07 units per square kilometre against 630.87 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf quota, us dollar, per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Democratic Republic of Congo?
35.2 units per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Democratic Republic of Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for imf quota, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 166th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 168th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF Quota, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: IMF Quota, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/congo-dem-rep/">Afghanistan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: IMF Quota, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF Quota, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF Quota, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.