What is the difference in imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre between Uganda and Zimbabwe?

27 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Uganda vs Zimbabwe: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre

Uganda

1,800 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

1,827 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Uganda rank

128th

Zimbabwe rank

127th

IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre over time

Uganda
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1,827 units per square kilometre against 1,800 units per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 27 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Uganda ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Uganda	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	112.88 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	112.88 units per square kilometre	Uganda
1970s	210.2 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	210.2 units per square kilometre	Uganda
1980s	461.54 units per square kilometre	451.34 units per square kilometre	10.2 units per square kilometre	Uganda
1990s	659.13 units per square kilometre	662.92 units per square kilometre	3.79 units per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2000s	903.36 units per square kilometre	913.53 units per square kilometre	10.17 units per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2010s	1,260 units per square kilometre	1,279 units per square kilometre	18.72 units per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	1,800 units per square kilometre	1,827 units per square kilometre	26.74 units per square kilometre	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre, Uganda or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 1,827 units per square kilometre against 1,800 units per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre between Uganda and Zimbabwe?: 27 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre?: Uganda ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uganda vs Zimbabwe: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-sdr-per-square-kilometre/uganda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-sdr-per-square-kilometre/uganda/zimbabwe/">Uganda vs Zimbabwe: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

IMF Quota, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.