China vs Iceland: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre

China
3,247 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
3,192 units per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
104th
Iceland rank
106th

IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Iceland
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 3,247 units per square kilometre against 3,192 units per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 55 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

China ranks 104th and Iceland ranks 106th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 128.84 units per square kilometre 128.84 units per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 241.4 units per square kilometre 241.4 units per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 235.79 units per square kilometre 546.33 units per square kilometre 310.55 units per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 353.27 units per square kilometre 831.82 units per square kilometre 478.56 units per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 733.83 units per square kilometre 1,173 units per square kilometre 439.24 units per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 1,892 units per square kilometre 1,984 units per square kilometre 91.86 units per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 3,247 units per square kilometre 3,192 units per square kilometre 55.42 units per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre, China or Iceland?
China, at 3,247 units per square kilometre against 3,192 units per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre between China and Iceland?
55 units per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Iceland rank globally for imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre?
China ranks 104th and Iceland ranks 106th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Iceland: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-sdr-per-square-kilometre/china/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-sdr-per-square-kilometre/china/iceland/">China vs Iceland: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF Quota, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.