Central African Republic vs Mauritania: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
178.82 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
124.96 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
182nd
Mauritania rank
185th

IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mauritania
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 178.82 units per square kilometre against 124.96 units per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 53.86 units per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.4 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 182nd and Mauritania ranks 185th of 189 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 10.26 units per square kilometre 6.25 units per square kilometre 4 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1970s 21.83 units per square kilometre 13.39 units per square kilometre 8.44 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1980s 45.72 units per square kilometre 30.45 units per square kilometre 15.27 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1990s 64.99 units per square kilometre 45.09 units per square kilometre 19.91 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 89.41 units per square kilometre 62.48 units per square kilometre 26.93 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 125.17 units per square kilometre 87.47 units per square kilometre 37.7 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 178.82 units per square kilometre 124.96 units per square kilometre 53.85 units per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Mauritania?
Central African Republic, at 178.82 units per square kilometre against 124.96 units per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Mauritania?
53.86 units per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Mauritania rank globally for imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 182nd and Mauritania ranks 185th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mauritania: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-sdr-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-sdr-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mauritania/">Central African Republic vs Mauritania: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF Quota, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.