Belarus vs China: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre

Belarus
3,357 units per square kilometre
in 2023
China
3,247 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
103rd
China rank
104th

IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • China
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 3,357 units per square kilometre against 3,247 units per square kilometre in China, a difference of 110 units per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 103rd and China ranks 104th of 189 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus China Difference Ahead
1990s 1,390 units per square kilometre 377.91 units per square kilometre 1,012 units per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 1,905 units per square kilometre 733.83 units per square kilometre 1,171 units per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 2,485 units per square kilometre 1,892 units per square kilometre 593.18 units per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 3,358 units per square kilometre 3,247 units per square kilometre 110.61 units per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre, Belarus or China?
Belarus, at 3,357 units per square kilometre against 3,247 units per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre between Belarus and China?
110 units per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and China rank globally for imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 103rd and China ranks 104th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs China: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-sdr-per-square-kilometre/belarus/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-quota-sdr-per-square-kilometre/belarus/china/">Belarus vs China: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF Quota, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.