Israel vs Trinidad and Tobago: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre

Israel
87,026 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
88,560 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
15th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
14th

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Israel
  • Trinidad and Tobago
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 88,560 units per square kilometre against 87,026 units per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 1,534 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 15th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 14th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 2,291 units per square kilometre 3,232 units per square kilometre 941.58 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 15,267 units per square kilometre 12,458 units per square kilometre 2,809 units per square kilometre Israel
1980s 23,638 units per square kilometre 26,636 units per square kilometre 2,998 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 46,197 units per square kilometre 91,762 units per square kilometre 45,565 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 50,504 units per square kilometre 79,525 units per square kilometre 29,022 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 74,234 units per square kilometre 81,603 units per square kilometre 7,369 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 88,750 units per square kilometre 92,606 units per square kilometre 3,857 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre, Israel or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 88,560 units per square kilometre against 87,026 units per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre between Israel and Trinidad and Tobago?
1,534 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Israel ranks 15th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 14th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Trinidad and Tobago: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/israel/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/israel/trinidad-and-tobago/">Israel vs Trinidad and Tobago: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.