Ecuador vs United Arab Emirates: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre

Ecuador
35,621 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
31,975 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
39th
United Arab Emirates rank
42nd

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • United Arab Emirates
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 35,621 units per square kilometre against 31,975 units per square kilometre in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 3,646 units per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 39th and United Arab Emirates ranks 42nd of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 97.97 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 97.97 units per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 165.33 units per square kilometre 410.64 units per square kilometre 245.32 units per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
1980s 1,477 units per square kilometre 1,507 units per square kilometre 29.22 units per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
1990s 1,533 units per square kilometre 3,969 units per square kilometre 2,437 units per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
2000s 2,248 units per square kilometre 9,709 units per square kilometre 7,461 units per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
2010s 3,756 units per square kilometre 21,150 units per square kilometre 17,393 units per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
2020s 33,177 units per square kilometre 33,462 units per square kilometre 285.38 units per square kilometre United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre, Ecuador or United Arab Emirates?
Ecuador, at 35,621 units per square kilometre against 31,975 units per square kilometre in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre between Ecuador and United Arab Emirates?
3,646 units per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United Arab Emirates?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and United Arab Emirates rank globally for imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 39th and United Arab Emirates ranks 42nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs United Arab Emirates: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-arab-emirates/">Ecuador vs United Arab Emirates: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.