Denmark vs Trinidad and Tobago: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre

Denmark
85,030 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
88,560 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
16th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
14th

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Trinidad and Tobago
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 88,560 units per square kilometre against 85,030 units per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 3,530 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 16th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 14th of 189 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 2,487 units per square kilometre 3,232 units per square kilometre 745.18 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 5,940 units per square kilometre 12,458 units per square kilometre 6,517 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 14,078 units per square kilometre 26,636 units per square kilometre 12,557 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 22,795 units per square kilometre 91,762 units per square kilometre 68,966 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 45,598 units per square kilometre 79,525 units per square kilometre 33,928 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 76,059 units per square kilometre 81,603 units per square kilometre 5,544 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 90,306 units per square kilometre 92,606 units per square kilometre 2,300 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre, Denmark or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 88,560 units per square kilometre against 85,030 units per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre between Denmark and Trinidad and Tobago?
3,530 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 16th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 14th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Trinidad and Tobago: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/denmark/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/denmark/trinidad-and-tobago/">Denmark vs Trinidad and Tobago: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.