Chile vs Zimbabwe: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre

Chile
2,282 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2,450 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
134th
Zimbabwe rank
131st

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2,450 units per square kilometre against 2,282 units per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 168 units per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 246.24 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 246.24 units per square kilometre Chile
1970s 549.08 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 549.08 units per square kilometre Chile
1980s 1,704 units per square kilometre 877.03 units per square kilometre 827.02 units per square kilometre Chile
1990s 1,453 units per square kilometre 1,340 units per square kilometre 113.31 units per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1,276 units per square kilometre 1,544 units per square kilometre 268.32 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 1,958 units per square kilometre 1,832 units per square kilometre 125.56 units per square kilometre Chile
2020s 2,365 units per square kilometre 2,517 units per square kilometre 151.87 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre, Chile or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2,450 units per square kilometre against 2,282 units per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre between Chile and Zimbabwe?
168 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.