Antigua and Barbuda vs Mauritius: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
60,860 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
67,702 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
27th
Mauritius rank
24th

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Mauritius
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 67,702 units per square kilometre against 60,860 units per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 6,842 units per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 24th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 1,078 units per square kilometre 1,078 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 16,194 units per square kilometre 16,194 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 10,479 units per square kilometre 96,436 units per square kilometre 85,957 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 25,463 units per square kilometre 46,630 units per square kilometre 21,168 units per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 44,730 units per square kilometre 62,331 units per square kilometre 17,601 units per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 144,399 units per square kilometre 63,712 units per square kilometre 80,686 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 62,512 units per square kilometre 71,943 units per square kilometre 9,431 units per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 67,702 units per square kilometre against 60,860 units per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Mauritius?
6,842 units per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Mauritius rank globally for imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 24th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Mauritius: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/mauritius/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Mauritius: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.