Antigua and Barbuda vs Italy: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
60,860 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy
49,826 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
27th
Italy rank
30th

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Italy
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 60,860 units per square kilometre against 49,826 units per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 11,034 units per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 27th and Italy ranks 30th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 5 and Italy in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Italy Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 461.29 units per square kilometre 461.29 units per square kilometre Italy
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 7,101 units per square kilometre 7,101 units per square kilometre Italy
1980s 10,479 units per square kilometre 6,869 units per square kilometre 3,610 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 25,463 units per square kilometre 13,331 units per square kilometre 12,131 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 44,730 units per square kilometre 26,430 units per square kilometre 18,300 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 144,399 units per square kilometre 43,239 units per square kilometre 101,160 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 62,512 units per square kilometre 51,943 units per square kilometre 10,569 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Italy?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 60,860 units per square kilometre against 49,826 units per square kilometre in Italy as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Italy?
11,034 units per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Italy?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Italy rank globally for imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 27th and Italy ranks 30th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Italy: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/italy/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Italy: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.