Slovenia vs Tuvalu: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per capita
Slovenia
279.38 units per person
in 2025
Tuvalu
273.12 units per person
in 2025
Slovenia rank
37th
Tuvalu rank
39th
IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per capita over time
- Slovenia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 279.38 units per person against 273.12 units per person in Tuvalu, a difference of 6.26 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 37th and Tuvalu ranks 39th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 149.7 units per person | 0 units per person | 149.7 units per person | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 208.32 units per person | 210.36 units per person | 2.04 units per person | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 279.2 units per person | 260.33 units per person | 18.87 units per person | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per capita, Slovenia or Tuvalu?
- Slovenia, at 279.38 units per person against 273.12 units per person in Tuvalu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per capita between Slovenia and Tuvalu?
- 6.26 units per person, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Tuvalu?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Slovenia and Tuvalu rank globally for imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per capita?
- Slovenia ranks 37th and Tuvalu ranks 39th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IMF holdings of currency, US dollar divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.