What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, sdr, per unit of gdp between Saudi Arabia and Uganda?

0.0001 units per US$ of GDP, with Saudi Arabia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Uganda?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Saudi Arabia vs Uganda: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP

Saudi Arabia

0.0059 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Uganda

0.0058 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Saudi Arabia rank

106th

Uganda rank

107th

IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP over time

Saudi Arabia
Uganda

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0059 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0058 units per US$ of GDP in Uganda, a difference of 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 106th and Uganda ranks 107th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Saudi Arabia	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0196 units per US$ of GDP	0.011 units per US$ of GDP	0.0086 units per US$ of GDP	Saudi Arabia
1970s	0.0056 units per US$ of GDP	0.0299 units per US$ of GDP	0.0242 units per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1980s	0.0158 units per US$ of GDP	0.1011 units per US$ of GDP	0.0853 units per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1990s	0.0291 units per US$ of GDP	0.0311 units per US$ of GDP	0.002 units per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2000s	0.0193 units per US$ of GDP	0.0212 units per US$ of GDP	0.0019 units per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2010s	0.0093 units per US$ of GDP	0.0082 units per US$ of GDP	0.001 units per US$ of GDP	Saudi Arabia
2020s	0.0068 units per US$ of GDP	0.0077 units per US$ of GDP	0.0009 units per US$ of GDP	Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, sdr, per unit of gdp, Saudi Arabia or Uganda?: Saudi Arabia, at 0.0059 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0058 units per US$ of GDP in Uganda as of 2025.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, sdr, per unit of gdp between Saudi Arabia and Uganda?: 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Uganda?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Saudi Arabia and Uganda rank globally for imf holdings of currency, sdr, per unit of gdp?: Saudi Arabia ranks 106th and Uganda ranks 107th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Uganda: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-sdr-per-unit-of-gdp/saudi-arabia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-sdr-per-unit-of-gdp/saudi-arabia/uganda/">Saudi Arabia vs Uganda: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,803 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

IMF holdings of currency, SDR divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.