What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, sdr, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Marshall Islands?

0.0009 units per US$ of GDP, with Marshall Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Marshall Islands?

56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Marshall Islands: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP

Eswatini

0.0139 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Marshall Islands

0.0148 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Eswatini rank

48th

Marshall Islands rank

45th

IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP over time

Eswatini
Marshall Islands

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 0.0148 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0139 units per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 48th and Marshall Islands ranks 45th of 189 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Marshall Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Marshall Islands	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0359 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0.0359 units per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
1980s	0.0482 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0.0482 units per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
1990s	0.0228 units per US$ of GDP	0.0186 units per US$ of GDP	0.0042 units per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2000s	0.0191 units per US$ of GDP	0.0242 units per US$ of GDP	0.0051 units per US$ of GDP	Marshall Islands
2010s	0.0127 units per US$ of GDP	0.0183 units per US$ of GDP	0.0056 units per US$ of GDP	Marshall Islands
2020s	0.0274 units per US$ of GDP	0.0162 units per US$ of GDP	0.0112 units per US$ of GDP	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, sdr, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Marshall Islands?: Marshall Islands, at 0.0148 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0139 units per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2025.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, sdr, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Marshall Islands?: 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Marshall Islands?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Marshall Islands rank globally for imf holdings of currency, sdr, per unit of gdp?: Eswatini ranks 48th and Marshall Islands ranks 45th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Marshall Islands: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-sdr-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-sdr-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/marshall-islands/">Eswatini vs Marshall Islands: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 10,803 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

IMF holdings of currency, SDR divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.