Chile vs Zimbabwe: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per square kilometre

Chile
1,701 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,826 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
134th
Zimbabwe rank
131st

IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1,826 units per square kilometre against 1,701 units per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 125 units per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 246.24 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 246.24 units per square kilometre Chile
1970s 459.63 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 459.63 units per square kilometre Chile
1980s 1,404 units per square kilometre 746.91 units per square kilometre 657.06 units per square kilometre Chile
1990s 1,028 units per square kilometre 950.26 units per square kilometre 78.09 units per square kilometre Chile
2000s 870.5 units per square kilometre 1,066 units per square kilometre 195.88 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 1,373 units per square kilometre 1,278 units per square kilometre 95.27 units per square kilometre Chile
2020s 1,715 units per square kilometre 1,826 units per square kilometre 111.09 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, sdr, per square kilometre, Chile or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1,826 units per square kilometre against 1,701 units per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, sdr, per square kilometre between Chile and Zimbabwe?
125 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for imf holdings of currency, sdr, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-sdr-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-sdr-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF holdings of currency, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.