Guatemala vs South Sudan: IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per capita
Guatemala
20.01 units per person
in 2025
South Sudan
20.18 units per person
in 2025
Guatemala rank
146th
South Sudan rank
144th
IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per capita over time
- Guatemala
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 20.18 units per person against 20.01 units per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0.17 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 146th and South Sudan ranks 144th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.97 units per person | 16.38 units per person | 1.59 units per person | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 20.78 units per person | 21.69 units per person | 0.9078 units per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imf holdings of currency, sdr, per capita, Guatemala or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 20.18 units per person against 20.01 units per person in Guatemala as of 2025.
- What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, sdr, per capita between Guatemala and South Sudan?
- 0.17 units per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Guatemala and South Sudan rank globally for imf holdings of currency, sdr, per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 146th and South Sudan ranks 144th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IMF holdings of currency, SDR divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.