Jamaica vs Rwanda: IMF-Adapted Readiness score
IMF-Adapted Readiness score over time
- Jamaica
- Rwanda
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.4293 against 0.4247 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0046.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 101st and Rwanda ranks 102nd of 192 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4373 | 0.4081 | 0.0292 | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 0.4327 | 0.4193 | 0.0134 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imf-adapted readiness score, Jamaica or Rwanda?
- Jamaica, at 0.4293 against 0.4247 in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imf-adapted readiness score between Jamaica and Rwanda?
- 0.0046, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Rwanda rank globally for imf-adapted readiness score?
- Jamaica ranks 101st and Rwanda ranks 102nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as IMF-Adapted Readiness score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.