Guinea vs Liberia: IMF-Adapted Readiness score
IMF-Adapted Readiness score over time
- Guinea
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0.3243 against 0.3182 in Guinea, a difference of 0.0061.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Liberia has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 153rd and Liberia ranks 151st of 192 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3103 | 0.3252 | 0.0149 | Liberia |
| 2020s | 0.3197 | 0.3338 | 0.0141 | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imf-adapted readiness score, Guinea or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 0.3243 against 0.3182 in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imf-adapted readiness score between Guinea and Liberia?
- 0.0061, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Liberia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Guinea and Liberia rank globally for imf-adapted readiness score?
- Guinea ranks 153rd and Liberia ranks 151st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as IMF-Adapted Readiness score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.