Croatia vs Cyprus: IMF-Adapted ND-GAIN Index
IMF-Adapted ND-GAIN Index over time
- Croatia
- Cyprus
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.5893 against 0.5856 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.0037.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Cyprus ahead.
Croatia ranks 42nd and Cyprus ranks 44th of 187 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5833 | 0.5941 | 0.0108 | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 0.5846 | 0.587 | 0.0023 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imf-adapted nd-gain index, Croatia or Cyprus?
- Croatia, at 0.5893 against 0.5856 in Cyprus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imf-adapted nd-gain index between Croatia and Cyprus?
- 0.0037, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Cyprus?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Cyprus rank globally for imf-adapted nd-gain index?
- Croatia ranks 42nd and Cyprus ranks 44th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as IMF-Adapted ND-GAIN Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.