Lithuania vs Namibia: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment-to-population ratio by
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment-to-population ratio by over time
- Lithuania
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 64.65 % against 64.12 % in Lithuania, a difference of 0.53 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Namibia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 42nd and Namibia ranks 39th of 79 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment-to-population ratio by, Lithuania or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 64.65 % against 64.12 % in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment-to-population ratio by between Lithuania and Namibia?
- 0.53 %, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Namibia rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment-to-population ratio by?
- Lithuania ranks 42nd and Namibia ranks 39th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment-to-population ratio by age, 55 to 64, rural areas — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database.