Namibia vs New Zealand: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment by age, 65+, rural areas
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment by age, 65+, rural areas over time
- Namibia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 37.2 1000 No against 35.74 1000 No in Namibia, a difference of 1.46 1000 No.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 53rd and New Zealand ranks 51st of 80 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment by age, 65+, rural areas, Namibia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 37.2 1000 No against 35.74 1000 No in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment by age, 65+, rural areas between Namibia and New Zealand?
- 1.46 1000 No, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Namibia and New Zealand rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment by age, 65+, rural areas?
- Namibia ranks 53rd and New Zealand ranks 51st of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment by age, 65+, rural areas — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database.