Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)

Bangladesh
6,488 current international $ per person
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
6,088 current international $ per person
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
123rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
126th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.0k4.0k6.0k199020072025

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 6,488 current international $ per person against 6,088 current international $ per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 400 current international $ per person.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 123rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 126th of 182 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 1,906 current international $ per person 2,356 current international $ per person 449.83 current international $ per person Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 2,920 current international $ per person 3,163 current international $ per person 242.79 current international $ per person Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 5,553 current international $ per person 5,489 current international $ per person 64.05 current international $ per person Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Bangladesh or Sao Tome and Principe?
Bangladesh, at 6,488 current international $ per person against 6,088 current international $ per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
400 current international $ per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Bangladesh ranks 123rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 126th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-capita/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-capita/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per capita
Unit
current international $ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 6,836 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.