Ecuador vs South Africa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant)

Ecuador
8,569 constant 2021 international $ per person
in 2025
South Africa
8,474 constant 2021 international $ per person
in 2025
Ecuador rank
95th
South Africa rank
96th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant) over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020072025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 8,569 constant 2021 international $ per person against 8,474 constant 2021 international $ per person in South Africa, a difference of 95 constant 2021 international $ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 96th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 6,875 constant 2021 international $ per person 5,506 constant 2021 international $ per person 1,369 constant 2021 international $ per person Ecuador
2000s 6,406 constant 2021 international $ per person 7,073 constant 2021 international $ per person 666.75 constant 2021 international $ per person South Africa
2010s 7,910 constant 2021 international $ per person 8,461 constant 2021 international $ per person 550.51 constant 2021 international $ per person South Africa
2020s 8,205 constant 2021 international $ per person 8,280 constant 2021 international $ per person 74.43 constant 2021 international $ per person South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (constant), Ecuador or South Africa?
Ecuador, at 8,569 constant 2021 international $ per person against 8,474 constant 2021 international $ per person in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (constant) between Ecuador and South Africa?
95 constant 2021 international $ per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (constant)?
Ecuador ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 96th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-constant-2021-international-per/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-constant-2021-international-per/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per capita
Unit
constant 2021 international $ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 6,553 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.