Czechia vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant)

Czechia
19,101 constant 2021 international $ per person
in 2025
Kazakhstan
17,632 constant 2021 international $ per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
56th
Kazakhstan rank
59th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant) over time

  • Czechia
  • Kazakhstan
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199020072025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 19,101 constant 2021 international $ per person against 17,632 constant 2021 international $ per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1,469 constant 2021 international $ per person.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 56th and Kazakhstan ranks 59th of 170 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 10,778 constant 2021 international $ per person 6,289 constant 2021 international $ per person 4,489 constant 2021 international $ per person Czechia
2000s 14,400 constant 2021 international $ per person 7,442 constant 2021 international $ per person 6,957 constant 2021 international $ per person Czechia
2010s 17,195 constant 2021 international $ per person 13,713 constant 2021 international $ per person 3,482 constant 2021 international $ per person Czechia
2020s 18,572 constant 2021 international $ per person 16,058 constant 2021 international $ per person 2,514 constant 2021 international $ per person Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (constant), Czechia or Kazakhstan?
Czechia, at 19,101 constant 2021 international $ per person against 17,632 constant 2021 international $ per person in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (constant) between Czechia and Kazakhstan?
1,469 constant 2021 international $ per person, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kazakhstan?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Czechia and Kazakhstan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (constant)?
Czechia ranks 56th and Kazakhstan ranks 59th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-constant-2021-international-per/czechia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-constant-2021-international-per/czechia/kazakhstan/">Czechia vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per capita
Unit
constant 2021 international $ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 6,553 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.