Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Latvia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 24,300 current international $ against 2,590 current international $ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 21,710 current international $.
That makes Latvia's figure about 9.4 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd and Latvia ranks 45th of 43 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 722.42 current international $ | 3,531 current international $ | 2,808 current international $ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1,014 current international $ | 6,970 current international $ | 5,956 current international $ | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1,613 current international $ | 12,469 current international $ | 10,856 current international $ | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2,209 current international $ | 21,023 current international $ | 18,814 current international $ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, ppp, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 24,300 current international $ against 2,590 current international $ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, ppp between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Latvia?
- 21,710 current international $, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Latvia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, ppp?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd and Latvia ranks 45th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB), note: This information is for PPP conversion factors., publisher: International Comparison Program (ICP), date published: May 30, 2024, published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator provides values for final consumption expenditure per person expressed in current international dollars, converted by purchasing power parities (PPPs). PPPs account for the different price levels across countries and thus PPP-based comparisons of economic output are more appropriate for comparing the output of economies and the average material well-being of their inhabitants than exchange-rate based comparisons. Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. The PPP conversion factor is a currency conversion factor and a spatial price deflator. PPPs convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalize their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries, thereby allowing volume or output comparisons of GDP and its expenditure components.