East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Finland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 31,456 current international $ against 10,068 current international $ in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 21,388 current international $.
That makes Finland's figure about 3.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and Finland ranks 24th of 43 groups.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 822.45 current international $ | 9,131 current international $ | 8,309 current international $ | Finland |
| 2000s | 2,000 current international $ | 14,722 current international $ | 12,722 current international $ | Finland |
| 2010s | 4,951 current international $ | 21,475 current international $ | 16,524 current international $ | Finland |
| 2020s | 8,364 current international $ | 28,521 current international $ | 20,157 current international $ | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, ppp, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Finland?
- Finland, at 31,456 current international $ against 10,068 current international $ in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, ppp between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Finland?
- 21,388 current international $, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Finland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Finland rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, ppp?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and Finland ranks 24th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB), note: This information is for PPP conversion factors., publisher: International Comparison Program (ICP), date published: May 30, 2024, published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator provides values for final consumption expenditure per person expressed in current international dollars, converted by purchasing power parities (PPPs). PPPs account for the different price levels across countries and thus PPP-based comparisons of economic output are more appropriate for comparing the output of economies and the average material well-being of their inhabitants than exchange-rate based comparisons. Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. The PPP conversion factor is a currency conversion factor and a spatial price deflator. PPPs convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalize their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries, thereby allowing volume or output comparisons of GDP and its expenditure components.