Croatia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP over time
- Croatia
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 25,874 current international $ against 3,858 current international $ in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 22,016 current international $.
That makes Croatia's figure about 6.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 38th of 182 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,051 current international $ | 1,190 current international $ | 3,861 current international $ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 8,456 current international $ | 1,651 current international $ | 6,805 current international $ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 12,521 current international $ | 2,522 current international $ | 10,000 current international $ | Croatia |
| 2020s | 21,732 current international $ | 3,329 current international $ | 18,403 current international $ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, ppp, Croatia or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Croatia, at 25,874 current international $ against 3,858 current international $ in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, ppp between Croatia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 22,016 current international $, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, ppp?
- Croatia ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 38th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB), note: This information is for PPP conversion factors., publisher: International Comparison Program (ICP), date published: May 30, 2024, published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator provides values for final consumption expenditure per person expressed in current international dollars, converted by purchasing power parities (PPPs). PPPs account for the different price levels across countries and thus PPP-based comparisons of economic output are more appropriate for comparing the output of economies and the average material well-being of their inhabitants than exchange-rate based comparisons. Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. The PPP conversion factor is a currency conversion factor and a spatial price deflator. PPPs convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalize their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries, thereby allowing volume or output comparisons of GDP and its expenditure components.