Puerto Rico vs Palestine: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Puerto Rico
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 4.4% against 4.1% in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Palestine ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 40th and Palestine ranks 37th of 172 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.2% | 3.2% | 2.0% | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 2.1% | 0.9% | 1.3% | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 2.3% | 1.4% | 0.9% | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 5.9% | -5.0% | 10.8% | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Puerto Rico or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 4.4% against 4.1% in Puerto Rico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Puerto Rico and Palestine?
- 0.3%, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Palestine?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Puerto Rico and Palestine rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Puerto Rico ranks 40th and Palestine ranks 37th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.