Poland vs Puerto Rico: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Poland
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 4.1% against 4.0% in Poland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Poland ranks 43rd and Puerto Rico ranks 40th of 172 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.6% | 9.7% | 3.1% | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 3.7% | 2.1% | 1.6% | Poland |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 2.3% | 1.0% | Poland |
| 2020s | 3.1% | 5.9% | 2.7% | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Poland or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 4.1% against 4.0% in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Poland and Puerto Rico?
- 0.1%, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Puerto Rico?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Poland and Puerto Rico rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Poland ranks 43rd and Puerto Rico ranks 40th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.