North Macedonia vs Peru: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- North Macedonia
- Peru
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 2.3% against 2.2% in Peru, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Peru ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 86th and Peru ranks 89th of 172 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.0% | 1.2% | 0.8% | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 3.9% | 3.5% | 0.5% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 2.6% | 3.9% | 1.3% | Peru |
| 2020s | 3.3% | 1.0% | 2.3% | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, North Macedonia or Peru?
- North Macedonia, at 2.3% against 2.2% in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between North Macedonia and Peru?
- 0.1%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do North Macedonia and Peru rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- North Macedonia ranks 86th and Peru ranks 89th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.