Nicaragua vs Palestine: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Nicaragua
- Palestine
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 4.4% against 4.4% in Palestine, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Palestine ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 36th and Palestine ranks 37th of 172 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.8% | 3.2% | 0.4% | Palestine |
| 2000s | 2.1% | 0.9% | 1.2% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 1.1% | 1.4% | 0.3% | Palestine |
| 2020s | 4.9% | -5.0% | 9.9% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Nicaragua or Palestine?
- Nicaragua, at 4.4% against 4.4% in Palestine as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Nicaragua and Palestine?
- 0.0%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Palestine?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Nicaragua and Palestine rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Nicaragua ranks 36th and Palestine ranks 37th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.