Madagascar vs Romania: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Madagascar
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.7% against 0.5% in Madagascar, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.3 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 130th and Romania ranks 127th of 172 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.3% | 0.8% | 2.1% | Romania |
| 2000s | -0.6% | 9.0% | 9.6% | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 4.2% | 4.0% | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 3.2% | 2.9% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Madagascar or Romania?
- Romania, at 0.7% against 0.5% in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Madagascar and Romania?
- 0.2%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Romania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Madagascar and Romania rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Madagascar ranks 130th and Romania ranks 127th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.