Low income vs Malaysia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Low income
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 3.9% against 1.2% in Low income, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 3.2 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malaysia ahead.
Low income ranks 42nd and Malaysia ranks 45th of 42 groups.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6% | 1.9% | 1.3% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 2.1% | 4.9% | 2.8% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | -1.2% | 5.2% | 6.5% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | -0.7% | 2.8% | 3.5% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Low income or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 3.9% against 1.2% in Low income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Low income and Malaysia?
- 2.7%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Malaysia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Low income and Malaysia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Low income ranks 42nd and Malaysia ranks 45th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.