Lebanon vs Mozambique: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Lebanon
- Mozambique
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports -5.2% against -6.3% in Mozambique, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 167th and Mozambique ranks 170th of 172 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.9% | 0.2% | 7.6% | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 3.2% | 5.1% | 1.9% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 2.2% | 1.6% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | -2.9% | 1.2% | 4.1% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Lebanon or Mozambique?
- Lebanon, at -5.2% against -6.3% in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Lebanon and Mozambique?
- 1.1%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Mozambique?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and Mozambique rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Lebanon ranks 167th and Mozambique ranks 170th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.