Latvia vs Marshall Islands: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Latvia
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 1.8% against 1.8% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 101st and Marshall Islands ranks 98th of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Marshall Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.1% | -2.0% | 6.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 4.2% | 4.4% | 0.2% | Marshall Islands |
| 2020s | 2.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Latvia or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 1.8% against 1.8% in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Latvia and Marshall Islands?
- 0.0%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Marshall Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Marshall Islands rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Latvia ranks 101st and Marshall Islands ranks 98th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.