Korea vs Macau, China: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Korea
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 1.5% against 1.4% in Korea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Korea ahead.
Korea ranks 112th and Macau, China ranks 110th of 172 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 3 and Macau, China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 7.9% | 3.2% | 4.6% | Korea |
| 1990s | 5.6% | 1.5% | 4.1% | Korea |
| 2000s | 3.6% | 2.5% | 1.0% | Korea |
| 2010s | 2.2% | 2.5% | 0.3% | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 1.3% | 1.6% | 0.3% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Korea or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 1.5% against 1.4% in Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Korea and Macau, China?
- 0.1%, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Macau, China?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2025.
- How do Korea and Macau, China rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Korea ranks 112th and Macau, China ranks 110th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.